No Need to Kill Your Television…It May Soon Kill Itself

Friday, July 27th, 2007

On Feb. 18, 2009, tens of millions of televisions that are not equipped to receive digital signals will become useless pieces of furniture. The government is spending $5 million to let owners know so they can do something about it — not enough, critics say.

While the government has committed $1.5 billion for viewers to spend on converter boxes that will translate digital signals for older televisions, it is largely relying on the broadcast industry to spread the word about the changeover.

There is a “high potential for a train wreck here,” said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.  Click here for the full St. Louis Post-Dispatch article and to find out how you can save your television with a converter box.

Swabs in Hand, Hospital Cuts Deadly Infections

Friday, July 27th, 2007

Although there is a growing clamor for universal health care, how to achieve this goal is still nowhere close to resolution. Therefore, some hospitals and states are taking action in areas where there is less controversy. These include trying to cut down on infections in hospitals, doing a better job of controlling costs, and eliminating medical errors. Click here for The New York Times article and more information about such a program in Pennsylvania.

Fixed-rate program offers needless security at high premiums for consumers

Thursday, July 26th, 2007

By: Heather Newgent

If an offer appears too good to be true, chances are it is. Just ask Laclede Gas who, cloaked in a scheming veil of customer service, is proposing a pilot program that could result in millions lost by participants.

The program will offer consumers the option of buying a twelve month fixed gas-rate, which, according to a recent article in the Saint Louis Post Dispatch, is an effort to “make their bills more predictable, not a vehicle to save money” (Laclede proposes letting customers choose fix-rate plans, June 10, 2007). What the article did not mention is that Laclede is including this plan as part of a broader rate-case proposal, despite the fact that similar fixed-rate programs in Illinois, Minnesota and Nebraska are experiencing relentless full-throttle challenges by advocacy groups, attorney generals and state commissions who want nothing short of their disappearance.

Foremost in the struggle against fixed-rate programs is Minnesota, where, according to Pam Marshall, executive director of Energy CENTS coalition, a nonprofit advocacy group, the programs are in the process of being terminated. “It was realized that the utilities prey upon peoples’ fear of high gas prices to market these programs as a predictable, safe alternative, but are offering nothing more than pure snake oil.”

From 2001 to 2006, customers of CenterPoint, a Minnesota utility, paid $26 million more on the fixed-bill than standard rate customers paid; in each of these years only 31,300 customers participated in the programs. According to Lori Swanson, Minnesota Attorney General:
‘The deals are stacked against consumers. . . . The product really amounts to a type of insurance policy — if you will — where the consumer is kind of buying insurance against a future increase in gas prices. And virtually every year every consumer has ended doing worse under the program than they would have done if they had not been under the program’ (Minnesota Public Radio, May 25, 2007).

The problems with fixed-rates have not been limited to higher gas bills. Marshall and Swanson agree that in many cases consumers were confused about what the program was really offering and did not know how difficult it would be to get out after enrolling. Also, many people mistook the fixed-rate program for a newer version of traditional budgeting, while others, terrified by the false threat of extremely volatile energy prices, felt pressured to buy into the idea of needing certainty (Minnesota Public Radio, May 25, 2007).

Illinois is no different. “In Chicago and the surrounding suburbs, where two companies offer plans similar to the one proposed by Laclede, more than 90 percent of customers ended up paying more than they would have otherwise” (St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 10, 2007).

According to Brian McDaniels, employee of the Citizens Utility Board, “of the hundreds of phone-calls I received from customers who were angry with these programs, there was one woman who absolutely loved it.” He explains that the woman was a landlord who advertised gas as being included in the rent. “She didn’t care that the gas rates were wasting money because she wasn’t the one paying them.”

Laclede is now working to finalize program details, which must then be approved by the Missouri Public Utility Commission. At this time Laclede has no comment regarding the outcomes of similar programs, and commission sources said they were unaware of the devastation all together. Marshall recalls a similar situation prior to adopting fixed-rate programs in Minnesota, for which she says, “the customers will most likely end up paying the price.”

The question now is, whether the Missouri Public Utility Commission is taking critical measures for ensuring consumers receive a fair and necessary service by Laclede and not the fate of those in Minnesota, Illinois and Nebraska. Prior to approving any type of fixed-rate program, the commission must gain a comprehensive understanding of what is being offered. For example, has the commission learned the answers to any of the following questions?:

1. Will fixed-rate customers be automatically re-enrolled for the program after one year of service?
2. Is Laclede offering a fixed-fuel-cost or a fixed-total every month?
3. Will Laclede show the fixed-fuel-rate and the regular consumer rate on each bill?
4. In the off chance that fixed-rate customers come out ahead, what rates can consumers expect the following year when Laclede attempts to make up forthe loss in profit?
5. What is Laclede’s projected bottom-line increase when figuring in the additional profits from the fixed-rate service?
6. Who will be charged with figuring out the fixed-rate? Will the methodology be public information? Will it be handled in-house or by an unregulated third party?
7. Why is Laclede offering a program that could result in a profit loss unless the majority of risk belongs to the consumer?
8. Why is this program even necessary when, according to information on Laclede’s website, extensive measures are already in place to ensure that St. Louis consumers get nothing but the best price for natural gas. It states:
Laclede Gas Company uses an aggressive approach to moderate the impact of price spikes on our customers that is designed to help ease their financial plan. Our objective is to increase price stabilization through our gas supply risk management program. This involves the utilization of a variety of financial instruments to “hedge” approximately 70 percent of our normal gas purchases.

Given the harmful track records of similar fixed-rate programs and Laclede’s high-tech capacity for managing gas prices, it is difficult to understand why the local company sees value in delivering a service that, most likely, will only succeed in proving the grim adage, warning: Buyer beware! No matter how great the offer, the house always wins!

Beware of Allstate!!!

Friday, July 20th, 2007
The Consumer Federation of America has issued a warning to consumers
saying Allstate is charging excessive rates for auto and homeowners
insurance.  In addition, a study for the Federation shows that Allstate
has one of the lowest levels of claims paid between 1997 and 2006.
To read the complete article, click here.



				

Another utility rate increase for St. Louis area consumers

Friday, July 20th, 2007

Although a 2.7% rate hike for Laclede Gas customers seems modest, remember this increase does not include the cost of the fuel you burn to stay warm in winter months.  The huge increases in natural gas prices over the last couple of years have put everyone in shock when the heating bills arrive.  Don’t expect that to improve much this winter.  The price of natural gas has remained high largely because it’s a favorite fuel for many electric utility companies in other parts of the country who use it to make electricity for air conditioning.  Click here for the details found in an article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Mandatory Binding Arbitration

Thursday, July 19th, 2007

The Consumers Council should actively support the current legislation at the national level to stop the wholesale assault on consumers perpetrated by arbitration clauses in consumer contracts.  You can read more about the issue here:

http://www.naca.net/binding-mandatory-arbitration/

You should also go to

http://ga4.org/campaign/stopbma

- where with a click of the button you can email your Representative and Senators and ask for their support of this legislation to curb consumer abuse.

submitted by Dale Irwin

AmerenUE upgrades ???

Wednesday, July 18th, 2007

If you were among the hundreds of thousands without power as a result of severe storms last year, it is good news to hear that AmerenUE is planning to upgrade its system and improve its tree trimming program.  Will it be enough, or once again will more than 600,000 customers face extended outages if the region is hit with severe storms in the future?  Only time will tell.

The Consumers Council is a bit skeptical, and it is continuing to ask the MO Public Service Commision for rules requiring AmerenUE to give rebates (or credits) of $25 a day for outages lasting longer than 48 hours.  We encourage you to support this plan with a message to the PSC.  The Chairman is Jeff Davis, and the e-mail address is www.psc.mo.gov or Box 360, Jefferson City, MO 65102.  See the following St. Louis Post Dispatch article for detailed plans of the upgrades.

 The Balm before the Storm

Author: Jeffrey Tomich

A year after thunderstorms packing hurricane force winds ripped through the area leaving 600,000 AmerenUE customers in the dark, the utility says it will invest hundreds of millions of dollars to fortify the power grid and make it less prone to widespread outages. Much of the spending – $100 million a year for three years – will be used to bury miles of overhead power lines, especially those most susceptible to falling trees and limbs. An additional $28 million a year over the same period will go for more inspections and repairs to fix problems with poles and hardware before they fail. St. Louis-based Ameren, which has 1.2 million Missouri customers, will announce the plans this morning as part of a three-year, $1 billion initiative called Project Power On. The project includes more funding for tree trimming and $500 million to install pollution controls at the 40-year-old Sioux power plant in St. Charles County. Ameren doesn’t have any plans to roll out a similar reliability project at its three utilities in Illinois, which are grappling with the response by customers and legislators to a steep jump in electricity prices after rate caps expired at the end of last year. Utility infrastructure projects rarely generate a public relations blitz. But few utilities have faced the fierce public backlash that Ameren did after three widespread power outages over a six-month period last year. And executives said they want customers to know they’re listening. “We have always made investments, we just didn’t talk about it,” Thomas R. Voss, AmerenUE’s chief executive, said in an interview at the company’s Chouteau Avenue headquarters. “We realized that was a mistake.” But AmerenUE officials insist that the project to “harden” its electric delivery system, and make it less prone to storms, isn’t an admission of any past failures. “This isn’t an issue of trying to improve something that was broken,” said Voss, who was named AmerenUE’s CEO last year. “This is trying to make it better than it was, especially for severe weather. This is all about going a step further.” Project Power On was conceived in January. Ameren spent six months and met with more than 150 local officials and neighborhood groups to identify and prioritize individual projects, and determine how much to spend on each, said Richard J. Mark, AmerenUE’s senior vice president of energy delivery. “It surprised all of us the amount of analysis it took to look at each of the 62 counties we serve and where the projects would be and determine manpower,” he said. At a cost of $1 million a mile, the $300 million set aside to bury some overhead power lines will cover only a tiny fraction of the utility’s 27,000 miles of existing overhead electric wire. Ameren also is encouraging cities to require underground utilities in new subdivisions. “We’re not on a path to put everything on our system underground,” Voss said. “It’s just to shore it up in areas where we think the system is weak. We think this will be an answer for what have been troublesome areas.” The first project, replacing 2,000 feet of overhead line with 2,800 feet of underground wire in the heavily wooded Talisman Way subdivision in north St. Louis County, is almost complete. A second is in the planning stages, Ameren spokesman Tim Fox said. The subdivision, made up of about two dozen homes, has been plagued by power surges and failures for more than two years, said Lorrie Backowski, a neighborhood association trustee who spent nine days without electricity after the storms last summer and also lost power in the December ice storm. “I’ve lived in the subdivision about 13 years, and I’ve probably made three or four food claims against my insurance for food spoilage,” she said. It required persistence to get Ameren’s attention, but Backowski said she is encouraged by efforts to permanently put an end to flickering lights, summer afternoons without air conditioning and spoiled food. Besides burying more lines, Ameren is beefing up inspections of infrastructure by establishing a “foot patrol” of circuit inspectors who will walk neighborhoods in search of problems. They’ll also test thermal imaging devices used on larger power lines to look for hot spots where corrosion or a loose connection could cause a power failure. The company says poles will be tested and replaced more frequently. The annual tree trimming budget has been boosted 40 percent to $45 million, as approved by Missouri regulators. And AmerenUE is voluntarily adopting the 2007 National Electric Safety Code for larger subtransmission lines even though it’s not required to do so. The reliability projects won’t prevent storm-related outages altogether but should help minimize damage, Voss said. And when outages do occur, customers will be able to check online whether their power has been restored with just a phone number, rather than being required to register with the website and establish a user name and password. The utility also established a team dedicated to more accurate restoration times during a major outage. “That’s something that no one’s been able to figure out at any utility anywhere,” Voss said. “But we’re going to make a better effort updating those.” Next week marks the anniversary of two severe thunderstorms that roared through the bistate region last July and left 1 million customers without power, some for more than a week. Hundreds of thousands of customers lost power in December and January after crippling ice storms coated trees and limbs, causing them to snap and topple power lines. The widespread outages prompted regulators in Missouri and Illinois to investigate Ameren’s preparation and response to the storms. The Missouri Public Service Commission has written new rules aimed at beefing up tree trimming requirements and implementing new standards for power line inspections across the state. The commission will conduct a public hearing on the rules next month in Jefferson City. A separate rule that would establish new reliability standards is still being discussed. Missouri’s top utility regulator, PSC Chairman Jeff Davis, said he is encouraged by some steps Ameren has taken over the past year and said two of the new rules could be in place by year’s end. “We need to see some results before we’re really content with how things are going,” Davis said. “It’s going to take a little time, but I think they’ve gotten started on it. We just need to keep pushing and making sure that they’re following through.” Ameren has questioned the need for reliability rules, which would require tens of millions of dollars in equipment to record momentary power blips. “There’s an awful lot of money needed for equipment to measure reliability and not actually fixing reliability, and we think that’s a mistake,” Voss said. The Consumers Council of Missouri is pushing regulators to establish what it considers an important provision in the rules being considered – $25 credits for customers who are without power for more than two days.”We’d certainly be unhappy if the commission doesn’t propose any type of customer credit,” said John Coffman, the group’s interim president. “I think most people are willing to persevere, but after 48 hours I think that goes beyond what customers expect.”

Reprinted with permission of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch 

Albert Slavin, President

Wednesday, July 18th, 2007

Website for Consumer Complaints

If you’re thinking about using a new company that you don’t know much about, you can now find out if the company has consumer complaints lodged against it.  Attorney General Jay Nixon has a new website which will give you a history or pattern of consumer complaints eagainst individual companies.  That website is:  www.consumer.ago.mo.gov/KNOW_MO.  For more information, you can also call 1-800-392-8222, 

There’s No Such Thing as a Free Lunch…and other Words of Wisdom and Warning

Wednesday, July 11th, 2007

Carnahan warns investors of ‘Top 10 Threats’

By Jerri Stroud

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

07/11/2007

A free lunch or dinner could cost an investor his life savings — if the investor buys into a risky scheme being promoted by an unscrupulous investment adviser, Secretary of State Robin Carnahan warned this week.

Carnahan rated dinner meetings used to promote such schemes at the top of her list of threats to Missouri investors this year. Coincidentally, Carnahan’s list arrived at a reporter’s house in the same batch of mail with one of those dinner invitations.

To read the rest of Carnahan’s list and the complete St. Louis Post-Dispatch story, click here.

PSC considers Laclede $38.6 million gas rate increase

Tuesday, July 10th, 2007

By Jeffrey Tomich

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

07/10/2007

Laclede Gas Co. customers would see rates rise an average of $36 a year under a settlement with the staff of the Missouri Public Service Commission and other customer groups.

For the full Post-Distpatch story, click here.