Missouri House Moves Meaningless Reform on Payday Lending Forward

Today the Missouri House Financial Institutions Committee passed a bill that purports to regulate payday lending in several ways – some of which appear to be beneficial to consumers. However, HB 2657 currently lacks the real regulatory changes the state of Missouri needs to protect its citizens. In fact, passage of this bill leaves Missouri far behind the regulation of all of our surrounding states.

First, and foremost the bill modestly reduces interest limits from 75% to 35%. While this appears to be beneficial, this rate is still 2.3 times higher than the rate cap of all surrounding states. Kansas, Iowa, Tennessee, Kentucky, Nebraska, Illinois, and Oklahoma all cap their rates at 15%. A 35% interest rate on a two –week loan translates into a whopping 910% APR, no nowhere near the generally accepted preferred APR cap of 36%.

Secondly, the bill reduces the number of renewals from six to two. While this gives the appearance of protecting consumers, there is no rationale for allowing them at all. All of our neighboring states do not allow renewals of any number.

To add insult to injury, HB 265 reduces the fee for payday lending licensing from $500 to $300. We fail to see a reason that could justify this reduction. The fee for licensing is relatively small compared to the income generated by these lenders and the fee helps pay for oversight of the industry and a state annual report that provides valuable insight into the impacts of payday lending on Missouri households.

Finally, we’d like to applaud changes to extended payment plans, but would like to point out that this will have very little impact on consumers. States with similar provisions report that less than 3% of eligible transactions actually utilize the extended payment plan.

Payday lending has a major impact on the state of Missouri. The most recent report on payday lending shows that 1.62 million payday loans were issued in 2016 which means on average 1 in 4 Missourians took out a payday loan. The average loan was $314.93 and carried an average interest rate of 462.87%. Assuming they are all paid off in two weeks, at least $90 million in interest and fees are leaving our state’s poorest household and being collected largely by out of state banks annually. This is tragic not only for Missouri families but terrible for our state’s economy.

While we are grateful that the Missouri House is hearing a bill on such an important topic, this bill will do very little to address the impacts it has. We are writing to encourage the Rules Committee to reject this bill in favor of additional dialog prior to the passage of any regulatory bill, include consumer advocates in the discussion and work on reform that will have meaningful impact on Missouri families.

Read More

Missouri Policies Allow Consumers to Be Overcharged for Drugs

Jefferson City — Believe it or not, generic medicines can be less expensive than co-pays, making them cheaper to buy outright than with insurance – but your pharmacist may be banned from telling you that. The cost difference doesn’t go to the pharmacist, it doesn’t go to the drug manufacturer, it goes to the middleman: the drug benefit manager. That payback is called a clawback.

Clawbacks can range from $2 to $30 a prescription, boosting profits while unfairly charging consumers.

Patients shouldn’t have to pay more than a drug costs. Many states are moving to block the “gag clauses” that prohibit pharmacists from telling customers that they could save money by paying cash rather than using their health insurance. Missouri should be the next state to join that list.

HB 1542 sponsored by Representative Lynn Morris, prohibits clawbacks and eliminates gag clauses in Missouri. This bill will allow your pharmacist to tell you the least expensive way to pay for your drugs and will save Missourians money.

“With the costs of drugs skyrocketing in this country, consumers should be enabled to make informed decisions.” says Cara Spencer of the Consumers Council of Missouri. “Policies that prohibit a pharmacist from communicating pricing information to a patient should have no place in our state. HB 1542 deserves to be heard.”

Please contact our state leadership and let them know that the cost of drugs is important to Missouri consumers and we shouldn’t have to pay more unknowingly.

MO Speaker of the House Todd Richardson:  573-751-4039, Todd.Richardson@house.mo.gov.
Majority Floor Leader Rob Vescovo: 573-751-3607,  Rob.Vescovo@house.mo.gov

Read More

Gas Rates Go Down and Low Income Residents Get Bill Assistance.

For Immediate Release
Contact: Cara Spencer, executive director of Consumers Council of Missouri
314-556-7379
 
Gas Rates Go Down and Low Income Residents Get Bill Assistance.
Jefferson City — The Missouri Public Service Commission just approved Spire’s new natural gas rates – effective April 19 – and your monthly gas bill will actually decrease, with the savings varying cross the state.
Last year, Laclede Gas Company (Spire’s Eastern Missouri territory) requested an increase of $3.31 per month for the average residential customer. But after a full audit and litigation of consumer concerns, these customers will actually see a rate reduction of approximately 5%, or an average of $2.00 per month less for an average residential consumer.
MGE (Spire’s Western Missouri territory) requested a $5.09 per month increase for the average residential customer but these customers will see a rate reduction of approximately 1%, or $0.40 less each month for an average consumer.
The measure is not a slam dunk for consumers – the order granted a very high profit level (9.8%) and approved a Weather Adjustment, which exposes consumers to future rate increases whenever we experience a warmer than normal winter, a rate mechanism that consumers will continue to fight. The Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge (ISRS) will also continue to grow in the future.
Overall, however, gas bills will go down this month, giving consumers a reason to cheer.
 
But this rate reduction almost didn’t happen. Two years ago, Consumers Council of Missouri successfully fought state legislation (HB 1471 – 2016 / SB 849 – 2016) that would have prevented this rate case from happening. At that time, the gas utility claimed that the legislation would spare ratepayers a costly rate increase.
 “Consumer advocates have been saying for years that gas delivery prices should be reduced, “ says John Coffman of Consumers Council “ and in fact, this is the third full rate case audit in a row that has resulted in some rate reduction for the Laclede Gas area.”
 
Another positive that came out of this most recent rate case was the outline of an improved low-income program, that should end up providing over a million dollars of relief, with rewards for participants who keep current on their bill payments. A settlement provides 120 days for the utility, consumer groups, and community action agencies to work out the details of this new program.

Read More
#thegov_button_662e5d1289561 { color: rgba(255,255,255,1); }#thegov_button_662e5d1289561:hover { color: rgba(49,49,49, 1); }#thegov_button_662e5d1289561 { border-color: rgba(204,0,0,1); background-color: rgba(202,44,40,1); }#thegov_button_662e5d1289561:hover { border-color: rgba(49,49,49, 1); background-color: rgba(255,255,255,1); }